Siddaramaiah’s poll affidavits show mismatch as 3-acre land under scanner: Report – Hindustan Times

The affidavits filed by Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah over the past three meeting elections revealed inconsistencies in property relating to a 3.16-acre agricultural land parcel in Mysore gifted to his spouse, B M Parvati Siddaramaiah, 14 years in the past, in response to The Indian Categorical.

This land, which was gifted to her in 2010 by her brother, has develop into the main target of a political controversy. The BJP has deliberate protests in Mysore, Siddaramaiah’s dwelling district, on July 12, questioning the land’s 2021 switch to the state in alternate for 14 housing plots developed by the Mysore City Improvement Authority (MUDA) beneath a controversial “50:50” alternate website scheme.

Learn: Amid MUDA ‘rip-off’, Karnataka govt transfers Mysuru Deputy Commissioner

A comparability of affidavits submitted by Siddaramaiah for the Meeting polls in 2013, 2018, and 2023 with public land information confirmed discrepancies relating to the three.16-acre agricultural land beneath survey quantity 464 in Kesare village of Kasaba Hobli, reported The Indian Categorical.

The 2013 affidavit, filed three years after the land was gifted, didn’t point out possession by Siddaramaiah’s spouse, regardless of land information exhibiting a mutation document created on October 20, 2010, for a present deed from B M Mallikarjunaswamy to his sister B M Parvati, in response to the report.

In 2018, Siddaramaiah’s affidavit acknowledged his spouse’s possession of the land, valued at ₹25 lakh, noting it was a present from her brother in 2010. By 2023, the affidavit detailed the allotment of 37,190.09 sq ft of land by MUDA in alternate for the Kesare village land, valued at ₹8.33 crore.

Learn: Karnataka BJP to carry large protests in Mysore in opposition to Siddaramaiah govt in alleged MUDA rip-off

These inconsistencies are central to a criticism by activist T J Abraham, alleging Siddaramaiah filed a “false affidavit” in 2013.

On Thursday, Siddaramaiah alleged that he was unnecessarily being focused within the case, claiming {that a} conspiracy is being hatched in opposition to him out of heartburn as he belongs to a backward class group and has develop into the chief minister for a second time.

Noting that in 2014, the MUDA, regardless of the three.16 acres of his spouse’s land not belonging to it, made websites on it and allotted them to folks, Siddaramaiah mentioned, “what ought to we do? Ought to we preserve quiet? Alternate websites had been sought by us, however we didn’t search them in any particular locality — Vijayanagara.”

“If MUDA dedicated the incorrect when BJP was in energy, how can Siddaramaiah be answerable for it?” he questioned.

As per the land acquisition act, his household is entitled to compensation from MUDA for taking up the land, Siddaramaiah mentioned. “MUDA must pay ₹62 crore (as compensation). Allow them to take again the alternate websites allotted. We had not requested for it in Vijayanagar…it was executed whereas BJP was in energy,” he mentioned.

To a query about activist T J Abraham submitting a criticism with the Election Fee in opposition to him alleging that he had didn’t disclose his spouse Parvathi’s possession of three acres and 16 guntas land in his election affidavit, Siddaramaiah mentioned, “If the Election Fee offers discover, I’ll reply to it. Will give no matter reply needs to be given in accordance with legislation.”